Stolen from my friend Vara on Facebook - who no doubt stole it from someone else... who stole it from....
well, you get the picture! :-)
MORE to BROWSE - Pages that might be of Interest
Thursday, 29 November 2012
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
Reviewing the Reviewers’ Reviews. (Tuesday Talk)
The subject of “reviews” or rather, Amazon Comments, came up the
other day. (I think on Facebook, can’t remember where.) The gist was: how
useful are these Amazon reviews?
I personally take little notice of the 5 star and 1 star comments,
the 5’s can often be “friends and family”, the 1’s are usually troll-ish rants.
I look at the 4 stars first, and I usually only award 4 stars for my own comments
– the 5’s, as far as I’m concerned, are the outstanding novels that I will want
to read again and again, my favourites, while the 4 stars are the darn good
reads.
I will also state here that I am more than happy to get 4 star
reviews for my books (though I do like the 5 stars! LOL)
Out of curiosity I decided to look at the reviews for my first
novel The Kingmaking which I originally had accepted for publication
nearly twenty years ago. Partly, I wish I hadn’t as the one star rants from the
US “reviewers” are a bit hurtful, but I swallowed that down and read through objectively.
On Amazon.com for this novel I’ve got (at time of
writing this article) six 1 star comments and twenty-six 5 stars. In the UK I
have seven 5’s and one 4 – that’s all.
(Hmm no trolls in the UK?) What struck me, though - outside of the fact that these people
obviously did not like the book (fair enough, each to their own) - was the uselessness of these lower star rants because
most of these reviewers had completely missed the point about the novel: I deliberately set out to portray King
Arthur as a non-Christian goody-goody, and to not stick to the more familiar traditional
tales.
This seems to have been less understood in the US than the UK –
perhaps UK readers are more open to change? I do also think that UK readers are
not so squeamish about violence in historical fiction, be it on the battlefield
or towards women. I have had American readers’ comments that state, “The
battles were too realistic and descriptive.” While another comment could
proclaim, “Hollick knows nothing of battles, she has no sense of what a real
battle was like.” (Er… has anyone got a real
idea of what battles in the Dark Ages were like?)
I have also found that American readers are not too keen on scenes
of rape or the fact that women in the past were often wedded (and bedded) at
twelve or thirteen years of age. Perhaps a UK reader’s perspective of history
is more ingrained in us then some American readers?
UK readers also do not seem so bothered about the pedantics of
whether a comma is in the right place or not, nor do we seem too affected by
Point of View Changes. Is this because our use of English English is somewhat
different from American English I wonder?
Here are a few examples of the differences of opinion:
“…We learn that Arthur isn't a great military leader, doesn't have
much of a sense of honor, drinks a lot, and is a horrible womanizer.”
And
“Most frustrating for the reader with some knowledge of the
Arthurian tradition is the way in which this tradition has been utterly
abandoned, then replaced with nothing of real value. The spiritual Arthur, the chivalric
Arthur, the noble Arthur, the sleeping Arthur whose legend inspires hope for
the British people are all gone. In their place is a greedy warlord who aspires
to little more than women, power, booze, and, did I mention, women?
The only saving grace in this story is that this Arthur is
probably closer to the historical figure (if he actually existed) than most of
the fictions we enjoy today. But beyond supposition, there's little evidence
that establishes this version over those it seeks to replace. There's nothing
gained by supplanting an inspiring fictional character with one who may be
closer to the texture of the warlords who lived in fifth and sixth century
Britain without, at least, some evidence that the new version is reasonably
accurate.”
Or
“There is no legend here, no vision. Power and money alone don't
last. Hollicks' Arthur is nothing but another petty warlord, no different from
any of history's other petty, brutal, unremembered warlords. The kind of lord
no person in their right mind would follow once the gold runs out. Of course
it's the author's right to spin such a tale - however, it rather misses the
point of the Arthurian legends altogether.”
These reviewers /commenters have missed the point that
a) I researched and used the early Welsh legends of Arthur – which
depict him as a rough, tough, not very likeable warlord (yes, complete with
hitting women!)
b) Have missed the point that the Dark Ages were not nice times.
Women got raped. Men went drinking and whoring. That’s the nitty-gritty truth
of history folks.
Other readers thought the complete opposite of the above. As in:
“I much prefer this "real" Arthur to the "fairy
tale" Arthur. What I like about historical fiction is that the people you read
about were actually living, breathing human beings and that makes it so much
easier to relate to their shortcomings or concerns or emotions. The Kingmaking
was a fabulous novel, hard to put down and now on my list of all-time
favorites! Helen Hollick's writing is fantastic and I am very much looking
forward to reading the next two in the series!”
And
“Helen Hollick has refused to be constrained by the stereotypical
Arthur we all know through legend - and of course TV! She has created a very
different man and we get to know him, his life and loves, warts and all. This
Arthur is very human and not always the good guy. This is a fascinating book.
I'm now reading the second one of the trilogy. It's great fun getting to know
all the characters and learn about their lives in 5th Century Britain. Thanks
Helen!”
And
“Personally I found the book very refreshing and forward looking,
if that can be said about a book that covers a period of time well over a
thousand years ago. It coincided closely with my own feelings on what the
Arthurian period may have been like. The book was certainly a million miles
away from the Hollywood image of the period.”
So are these reviews a
balanced blend of differing opinions, or biased rants bordering on being nasty because
I have dared to depict Arthur in a different light than the more normal Christian
almost saint-like king? Are the opposing views useful or not? I suppose it
depends on how you personally think of Arthur, and the content of my novel. If
you prefer the chivalric king who would shudder at even a mild swear-word – and
a reader who abhors even a hint of violence against women, then no, my books
are not for you.
I have actually received hate-mail from American readers who have
been less than pleasant with their choice of (very rude) words because my
Arthur is not a Christian. (Mail from Good Christian People, I might add. As a
Pagan I don’t particularly mind being assigned to Hell or threatened by the
wrath of God though; I don’t believe in Hell or God.)
As interesting are the opposing views of my writing. These vary
from:
“…. the tortured prose that suffuses most of Ms. Hollick's
narrative …. prose that leaves the battlefield strewn with thousands of
innocent and irrelevant descriptive phrases where simple and direct depictions
of action could better help the reader to understand what is happening and why
it's important.
And
"The Kingmaking is boring. It's like watching mediocre actors
in a familiar story; we know the archetypes and the basic plot, but it's all
written in a way that Hollick seems to think it should be written rather than
with any actual effort behind it.”
Well yes, I did write it as I thought it should be written… isn’t
that what individual authors do? It would be boring if we all wrote the same
way wouldn’t it?
And on my accuracy of history, apparently I have no knowledge of
the period:
“Without sufficient knowledge of the historical period, very
little awareness of the warrior culture of which she would write, possessing
unrefined writing skills, but with an apparently strong desire to explore the
love story of Arthur and Gwenhwyfar (that's Guinevere to most of the rest of
us), an inexperienced author bit off more than she was ready to chew. The
result, unfortunately, was "The Kingmaking".
On the other hand:
“It was a rather fast read because it was action packed. I felt
like this Arthur and Guinevere could really have existed. It's a novel set in
the Dark Ages and remains faithful to the times, not the romanticized idea of
King Arthur's Camelot. I recommend this book to anyone interested in Arthurian
literature or historical fiction. It's not really a romance novel, as it has
more battle and action than historical romance does. It's a highly enjoyable
read.”
And
“Don't read this book (or any of the trilogy) expecting a tale of
mystery, magic and Merlin. Rather a historian's view of what the real Arthur
and Britain in the post-Roman, pre-Saxon age might have been like. This is a
time when Rome has deserted the British and the English are only just arriving
from 'Germany' bringing with them upheaval and a constant struggle for power. A
time when 1000 soldiers is considered a major force and tribal and ethnic
loyalties are constantly shifting. As in real life many people are looking to
the past and the glory of Rome while others want to look to the future. Not as
clear a distinction as it sounds. Dirt, death, tragedy and a nicely
dispassionate view of life and death keeps the books rocking along even though
they are quite substantial. I did manage to put it down but it did certainly
keep me popping back as often as possible.”
A historian well versed in this period praised me in a review for
the Historical Novel Society for my historical detail being superbly accurate, so
I suppose the consensus of opinion is – reviews are not necessarily useful or
helpful, because different readers have vastly different perspectives. Which is
a good thing, because it would disastrous for Imaginative Fiction if all books
- and the subsequent opinions of them - were all the same!
Meanwhile – if you’d like to add a comment about the Kingmaking
(or any of my novels) onto Amazon, please do… as long as it’s a nice one LOL
My Amazon Author Page
The Kingmaking available at an Amazon store near you:
(US publisher Sourcebooks Inc)
(UK publisher Silverwood Books)
Originally published by William Heinemann.
Full details of the Pendragon's Banner Trilogy HERE
soon to be published in German by Sadwolf
Thursday, 22 November 2012
Thanksgiving Day USA (the Thursday Thought)
With all best wishes to the
United States of America
for a
Happy and Peaceful
Thanksgiving
we do not celebrate Thanksgiving here in the UK - but everyone, everywhere in the world should find the time for a quiet moment of thought and be thankful for something, no matter how small, how apparently unimportant.
Even when things seem at their bleakest there is still something to be thankful for - your health, your friends, the sun that shines, the plants that grow...
Thank you, Great Spirit for all the wonderful people in my life;
those I have met, and those I have yet to meet.
Thursday, 15 November 2012
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
For Those In Peril On The Sea - Tuesday Talk
The Tragedy of the Bounty
There are, probably, three Tall Ships that are the most well known: The Cutty Sark, the Victory, and the Bounty - famed for the Mutiny on the Bounty.
Tragically, Bounty was lost at sea during the onslaught of hurricane Sandy. Bounty began taking on water on Sunday 28th October and lost power about 90 miles off the N.C. coast. Apparently the ship was taking on two feet of water an hour, when the crew abandoned her she had about ten feet of water on board.
The Captain remains missing.
I wanted to write something as a tribute to Bounty's loss and for the members of her crew who drowned - not especially for the ship, as so much tragedy, destruction and death occurred because of the hurricane, but because my thoughts kept turning, again and again, to the hundreds (thousands perhaps?) of sailors who were lost at sea during the age of sail.
We do not know who most of them were - nor do we know how, when, why, or where they died. I assume somewhere there are logbooks of ships that set sail never to return, and there have been occasional wrecks found.
UK TV didn't seem to think the matter of the Bounty's loss important enough for our news bulletins, and I do not read newspapers and so I discovered the loss somewhat late in the history of the Storm.
This may be fanciful, but when I read of the Bounty on Facebook, my soul wept for all the widows of past sailors. I heard a joint cry of grief from all those voices from the past. I do not know why, but I have an affinity with the sea - for my own novels the Sea Witch Voyages I just seem to "know" a lot of the nautical information. My paternal ancestors came from the English shipping port of Bristol (genealogy traced back to the mid 1600's) and maybe a previous incarnation has connections with the sea, who knows the reason - I love Tall Ships, end of story.
Today, we owe a lot to those intrepid men who set out to discover the world, to carry goods for trade, to fight for their Country's freedom - not just the known names; Drake, Columbus, Dampier, Cook, Darwin et al, but the unknown captains and crew who never came back.
My respect to you all, and may your souls rest at peace in the realm of the sea.
Possibly a unique picture of a Tall Ship's last moments. the tragic sinking: photo taken by the US Coast Guard |
This article was written by my good friend John F. Millar of Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia, he has kindly granted me permission to reproduce it here. Thank you John.
BOUNTY Reminiscences
by John Fitzhugh Millar
Many Hampton Roads residents will remember
fondly the jaunty blue Tall Ship Bounty,
which was present here for many Harborfests and for last summer’s Operation
Sail. She will now never return, but local artist Bob Holland painted a lovely
portrait of her, from which prints are available.
Bounty
was built for MGM Films in 1960 at Lunenburg, Nova Scotia in the same
shipyard that built my own ship, the 24-gun Revolutionary War frigate Rose, in 1969 – another frequent
participant in Harborfest until she moved to San Diego in 2002 to star in the
Russell Crowe film Master &
Commander: to the Far Side of the World. By amazing coincidence, the
original Rose (built 1756) and the
original Bounty (built 1784) were
produced by the same shipbuilder, Hugh Blaydes, at Hull, Yorkshire.
MGM was worried about the
comfort of Marlon Brando and the other stars involved in filming Mutiny on the Bounty on location off
Tahiti. The only way they could incorporate all the air-conditioning equipment
they felt they needed was to make Bounty over
a third again as big as the original ship – so much for authenticity! Bounty also appeared in other movies, including
Treasure Island, the Monty Python
pirate film Yellowbeard, and Pirates of the Caribbean II.
Bounty
spent many profitable years after the Brando movie open to the public at
Saint Petersburg, Florida. After Ted Turner had purchased MGM, he decided to
use the then deteriorating Bounty as
a giant tax write-off by donating her to the city of Fall River, Massachusetts.
Early in 1994, Richard Bailey, captain of
the Rose, received a telephone call
from an official at Warner Brothers, wanting to know if Rose would be available for filming a re-make of the Errol Flynn
film Captain Blood, and whether
Bailey could recommend a second ship representing the same period. Rose would be available, but Bounty was in such rotten condition that
she could not safely cross the harbor, let alone go to sea. “We’re sending you
by Fedex a certified check for $750, 000,” said the official. “Get her
repaired.” Bounty had been built of
seasoned New Jersey oak, which explains how she had lasted so long. Several
months later, Bailey telephoned the official in California to report that the
work (mostly replacing the topsides) had been completed, and to ask where and
when the company needed the two ships. “Oh, you spent all that money, huh?”
said the official. “We were unable to find an actor who could match Errol
Flynn, so the movie is cancelled.”
Therefore, because of Bailey’s quick
thinking, Bounty received a complete
rebuilding at no charge that enabled her to start sailing again. Her first
voyage was to accompany Rose in the
summer of 1995 to historic
Louisbourg, Nova Scotia (Canada’s counterpart to Colonial Williamsburg), where
thousands of re-enactors had arrived to mark the 250th anniversary
of the 1745 capture of Louisbourg by amateur New England soldiers. The two
ships contributed greatly to the colorful event there.
A few
years afterwards, businessman Robert Hansen, a wealthy sail-trainee, told
Bailey that his week-long experience cruising aboard Rose was the most fun thing he had ever done. Could he buy the Rose? Bailey replied that Rose was not for sale, but he thought
that Bounty might be available. Hansen
then bought Bounty in 2001, and found that she was leaking badly
and that her entire bottom needed to be replaced. With difficulty, she was
towed to Maine and the work was done. Hansen founded a non-profit foundation to
manage the ship, and developed an educational program out of Greenport, Long Island
that took her to many ports over the next few years.
Historic wooden ships, unless they are built
of exotic tropical hardwoods or of epoxy-saturated wood laminates, have a
finite life-span of about 10 – 20 years, and then they have to be rebuilt. Bounty eventually faced rebuilding
again, so she went to Maine in 2006 for a multi-million-dollar refit. Following
that, Bounty was sent on an exciting tour completely around
the world, during which she faced periods of intensely fierce weather. Not long
after completing her circumnavigation with a crew of about 18, Bounty came to Norfolk and Portsmouth
for Operation Sail, and many people saw her depart afterwards under full sail –
an impressive sight. She visited nearly all the Operation Sail ports on the East
Coast. It was planned to take her on another European tour in 2014.
With the approach of winter, it was decided
to take Bounty to Florida. Robin
Walbridge, aged 63, had been Bounty’s captain
since her Fall River days. He had taken the ship through many storms over the
years, and he thought that skirting hurricane Sandy on a passage to Florida was
preferable to facing the storm in Long Island Sound. He reckoned without the
huge, confused seas off Cape Hatteras as the hurricane passed the area. The typical
waves there were over 20 feet high, and because the hurricane winds had
switched around three-quarters of the compass some of the waves combined with
others to make monsters as high as 50 feet. The crew, mostly inexperienced, did
an admirable job of lowering the upper masts and yards down to the deck to
reduce windage, but the ship took on massive amounts of water due to the
enormous waves, and soon the two large diesels failed about 90 miles southeast of
Cape Hatteras. Walbridge requested a Coast Guard rescue just before daybreak on
29 October, got the crew into survival suits, and launched two large
life-rafts. Walbridge and two other crewmembers were swept into the water, and
only one of them was recovered alive. The ship herself sank minutes after Coast
Guard helicopters arrived.
Claudene Christian, aged 42, ironically the
5-greats-granddaughter of Fletcher Christian, who had led the mutiny on the
original Bounty in April, 1789, was
not so fortunate. Her body was recovered by the Coast Guard, and Walbridge
remains missing.
Another copy of Bounty (this time the correct size and correct pumpkin color, not
blue) was built in New Zealand in 1979 for the Dino de Laurentiis film. After
many years of being based in Sydney, Australia, she is now based in Hong Kong.
Many Tall Ships will continue to visit
Hampton Roads in the coming years, but it will take a long time to erase the
positive memory of Bounty’s colorful
visits here.
Photo: Cathy Millar, John's wife |
Bounty sailing out of Norfolk at the end of Operation Sail.
Sunday, 11 November 2012
In Honour of those who died...
On September 7th 1920, in strictest secrecy four unidentified British bodies were exhumed from temporary battlefield cemeteries at Ypres, Arras, the Asine and the Somme. None of the soldiers who did the digging were told why.
The bodies were taken by field ambulance to GHQ at St-Pol-sur-Ternoise. There the bodies were draped with the Union Flag. Sentries were posted and Brigadier-General Wyatt and a Colonel Gell selected one body at Random. A French honour guard was selected, who stood by the coffin overnight. In the morning of the 8th a specially designed coffin made of oak from the grounds of Hampton Court was brought and the Unknown Warrior placed inside. On top was placed a Crusaders Sword and a shield on which was inscribed 'A British Warrior who fell in the Great War 1914-1918 For King and Country'. On the 9th of November the Unknown Warrior was taken by horse drawn carriage through Guards of Honour and the sound of tolling bells and bugle calls to the Quayside. There it was saluted by Marechal Foche and loaded onto HMS Verdun bound for Dover.....The coffin stood on the deck covered in wreaths and surrounded by the French Honour Guard. On arrival at Dover the the Unknown Warrior was greeted with a 19 gun salute, normally only reserved for field marshals. He then traveled by special train to Victoria station London. He stayed there overnight and on the morning of the 11th of November he was taken to Westminster Abbey.
The Idea of the Unknown Soldier was thought of by a Padre called David Railton who had served at the front during the Great War and it was the Union Flag he used as an altar cloth at the front, that had been draped over the coffin. The intention was that all relatives of the 517,773 combatants whose bodies had not been identified could believe that the Unknown Warrior could very well be their lost Husband, Father, Brother or Son....
Every year on the 11th of November remember the Unknown Warrior.
originally posted by Stuart MacAllister on his Facebook page (thank you Stuart)
Thursday, 8 November 2012
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
The Next Big Thing (Tuesday Talk)
I've been tagged.
So what does that mean - and what's this "Next Big Thing" thingy all about?
The nitty gritty of The Next Big Thing Blog Hop is that I do a
blog post answering the questions below and mentioning the person who tagged
me, and at the end of it I mention the authors I’ve tagged in
the chain.
I was tagged by fellow writer Isabelle Goddard who writes Regency Romances. She has published three novels and a fourth
is in the pipeline. Recently, she’s moved on to Victorian England with
Walking Through Glass which tells the story of a forgotten tragedy and the way
echoes from the past can powerfully influence the life of a modern day heroine. (Which is a very similar theme to my next novel ... read on...)
I'm instructed by Isabelle to tell you all about my next book by
answering these ten set questions, so here I go!
What is the working title of your next
book?
My next book due out is called Ripples In The Sand – the
Fourth Sea Witch Voyage.
Where did the idea come from for the
book?
As it is the fourth in a series I have a rough idea for the
first six – basically for Ripples, my Pirate, Jesamiah Acorne, sails to England with a cargo of tobacco which he wants to sell. Needless to
say, things don’t go as planned….
What genre does your book fall under?
Historical Adventure with a touch of fantasy.
Which actors would you choose to play
your characters in a movie rendition?
Someone new and unknown for my pirate please, and I’d rather have
the Sea Witch Voyages as a TV drama series, not a movie.
The nautical equivalent of Bernard Cornwell/Sean Bean’s Sharpe.
The nautical equivalent of Bernard Cornwell/Sean Bean’s Sharpe.
What is the one-sentence synopsis of
your book?
All Captain Jesamiah Acorne wants to do is sell his (legal) cargo
of tobacco, but being captured by the Spanish, meeting with an old flame, and
(illegally) breaking his wife’s brother out of jail – aided by the remnants of
the notorious Doones of Exmoor – is not part of his plan.
(LOL - I cheated with a long sentence!)
(LOL - I cheated with a long sentence!)
Will your book be self-published or
represented by an agency?
Self-published with an assisted publishing company www.silverwoodbooks.co.uk
How long did it take you to write the
first draft of your manuscript?
I had several unavoidable hold-ups from that annoying thing called
Life, one of them being my previous UK publisher went bankrupt. This proved a
good thing in the end, however, as the MD was, I discovered, not entirely
reliable financially (that's being tactful), so I moved to the fabulous Indie company SilverWood Books
UK. Best decision I’ve made in a long while.
This meant having to re-edit all my files as the finals were not returned to me by said bankrupt scoundrel – editing seven manuscripts in less than four months and writing a new novel were not compatible tasks, so Ripples In The Sand took a lot longer than I intended - my deepest apologies to all Jesamiah’s patient fans!
This meant having to re-edit all my files as the finals were not returned to me by said bankrupt scoundrel – editing seven manuscripts in less than four months and writing a new novel were not compatible tasks, so Ripples In The Sand took a lot longer than I intended - my deepest apologies to all Jesamiah’s patient fans!
What other books would you compare this story to within your
genre?
The Sea Witch Voyages are a blend of Hornblower, Sharpe, Flashman,
Pirates of the Caribbean and Indiana Jones (OK I cheated on the last two as
they are movies!)
Who or What inspired you to write this
book?
Jack Sparrow. I loved the first Pirates of the Caribbean movie, a
Good Fun Yarn, not meant to be taken seriously, just enjoyed. To follow the fun I looked for novels that were similar – nautical
tales with a twist of fantasy and a dashing rogue of a pirate captain – but I
could only find straight nautical fiction – C.S. Forrester, Patrick O’Brian,
Alexander Kent, Julian Stockwin etc, all very good novels, but not remotely akin
to Jack Sparrow.
So I wrote my own. And fell n love with my character Jesamiah in the process.
So I wrote my own. And fell n love with my character Jesamiah in the process.
What else about your book might pique the reader's interest?
I have added a touch of fantasy to the Sea Witch stories: Jesamiah's girlfriend/wife, Tiola (pronounce it as tee-o-la, short and quick, not a long middle vowel: Tee-oh-la) She is a healer. midwife - and a white witch. I wanted to create her to be believable, though. She can only use her Craft for good, and not in every circumstance. No waving magic wands to get Jesamiah out of trouble! I think of her ability as like the Force in Star Wars, not as in the magic of Harry Potter.
For more about the Sea Witch Voyages - excerpts, book trailers - a few fun pirate quizzes - and lots more! http://seawitchvoyages.blogspot.co.uk/
For my other novles please visit my Main Website
Here are the authors I've tagged who
will tell you about their
will tell you about their
Next Big Thing!
Suzanne McLeod : www.spellcrackers.com/ Brilliant fantasy author for adults - Murder and Mayhem at Spellcrackers.com!
Debbie Young : Off The Shelf and her website Her new book Sell Your Book - hints and tips for new writers on how to get your book noticed
David Ebsworth : website His novel Jacobites' Apprentice was nominated UK Indie Editor's Choice for the Historical Novel Society Indie Review
Richard Denning : website Historical Adventure and Fantasy writer for young adults
Beachy Books : website excellent interactive books for young children - ideal Christmas Gifts!
subscribe to additional content on my website for up to date information!
Richard Denning : website Historical Adventure and Fantasy writer for young adults
Beachy Books : website excellent interactive books for young children - ideal Christmas Gifts!
Ripples In The Sand - publication date
early December
(in time to celebrate my pirate's birthday!
Thursday, 1 November 2012
For those of us who are cat lovers...
Why do we put up with the apparent casual demands of Puss? (Rhetorical question. I don't think there's a sane answer.)
(not my cat - but a cute pic!) |
Sitting watching TV: made myself comfy in the chair - within two minutes a series of "meows" and here is Sybil on my lap yamming away demanding attention. That's fine, I love her on my lap (better than any hot water bottle) but she doesn't seem to understand that I'm engrossed in Downton Abbey and really don't want half the screen obscured by her bum. As lovely as it is.
Sybil watching TV |
Does your cat bop you with his/her paw of a morning to wake you up? Light dabs on the tip of my nose. Open my sleepy eyes to stare straight into Sybil's, followed by an enthusiastic meow, which can only translate as, "Oh Good! You are awake!"
Sybil on my bed |
Mab as a kitten |
Sigh.
Windowsill Mab |
Both Mab and Sybil are not too amused that the days are turning colder, though they are pleased that the central heating is on. Mab stretches out along the radiator in my bedroom and Sybil enjoys the window sill. I've given up putting the ornaments and picture frames straight; such unnecessary items are now removed so that Madam can stretch out.
Fat Cat Sybil |
Not surprising there are few bees and butterflies in my garden |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)