My regular blog-readers might remember an article I posted back in
January about our “moving to Devon anniversary”, and my concerns about the local
hotel, Highbullen (link via Tripadvisor) expanding into something completely inappropriate for this
little village. I had a lot of feedback, especially from those of
you who have visited me (and the village) and who enjoy my Devon Diary Blog
Well, the saga continues!
(and apologies for this post being a long one - I have a lot to say! I suggest make a cup of tea or coffee, or fetch a glass of wine and sit back & read...)
(and apologies for this post being a long one - I have a lot to say! I suggest make a cup of tea or coffee, or fetch a glass of wine and sit back & read...)
Here’s a resume of that article… (link to full article below)
“Highbullen is being redeveloped…
Ninety-four timeshare lodges are to be built. James Hemming, the hotel's
manager, according to a local newspaper, hopes that Highbullen will become ‘one
of Devon's premier leisure destinations’.
The overall guest
accommodation capacity is set to increase by 700%. What impact will this have on our narrow, unlit roads? What sort of impact will hundreds of people coming to use this
enormous enterprise have on our tiny, quiet, rural, village? What will they do
with themselves? …. drive out to the lovely beaches or explore Exmoor or the
old Pannier markets at Barnstaple and South Molton? Note drive. There is no public transport in our
village. There is the Tarka Line train, but the nearest stations are
a good couple of miles away.
It is difficult enough using the lanes in and
out of Chittlehamholt as it is – most trips you have to reverse many yards
because of oncoming traffic… and that is meeting just the occasional solitary
car ... although no one will be able to reverse anyway if two
tractors and an oil-delivery lorry completely gum everything up.”
So what has changed these eight months later? Not a lot. The
ninety-four lodges have been dropped to fifty-eight…. Ah, but there’s now also
the prospect of an additional sixteen bedrooms being added to the hotel, so
that’s still an expansion of seventy-four.
Keep in mind two important facts here:
One: there are less than ninety houses in the entire village.
Two: There are five lanes leading up to the Chittlehamholt Ridge and they look like this:
A couple are a bit wider in places, but not by much. There are very few passing bays, all the lanes are
very
steep with blind bends. If you meet a tractor or similar large vehicle
– too bad if you are not very good at reversing, but don't worry - you are about to get a very quick lesson and a lot of practice!
Concerned about your car being scratched by the brambles in the hedges?
If so, don’t come to Chittlehamholt.
Highbullen has stated that it intends to pay for some of the
existing passing places on one of the approach lanes (the main one from South
Molton, known as Newlands Hill) to be lengthened and a few new ones to be put
in. That sounds reasonable doesn’t it?
Um, no, not when you look closer.
There’s not really any room to lengthen or add. Highbullen actually
published in their planning application (which appeared on the North Devon
Council website) that they had permission to remove the hedging and banks, and
install these extra passing places from a farmer who owns some of the land alongside Newlands Hill. At a recent village public meeting (more
about that in a minute) it emerged that this farmer has not given
permission – and in fact has outright refused it!
And if one (let’s say ‘over-enthusiastic speculation’) can sneak its way in to a very important document, how many others are lurking under the
stones of Highbullen’s planning proposals like gobble-everything-up
monsters, I wonder?
is Highbullen telling porky-pies? I’ll leave you to decide. |
I suppose to be fair about this I had better add that not everyone
in the village, and immediate surrounding area, are against Highbullen’s proposals.
(Though the 'fors' are very much in the minority - at a recent vote, four out of seventy-two).
Highbullen is a business, it needs to survive as a business.
Management claims the expansion will lead to more employment, bring business to the area, and new life to the village.
So will it?
Initially, there might be business for local builders, but only
temporarily, and there’s no guarantee they will be local. Ongoing, I suppose
there will be food suppliers, maintenance needs and such, and as these will be
holiday lodges (self-catering timeshare accommodation) people will want grocery
supplies. Tesco/Sainsbury delivery vans one suspects. More traffic.
What about waiting staff and cleaners? We are a very small
village. Most of the present employment at HB are students (a few are from the
village) but this is temporary employment, not long-term, well-paid careers. And
if you look carefully at the Highbullen wording it implies “employment for
local residents within a seven mile radius”.
Ah, not villagers then, but people
living in the nearest town, South Molton, seven miles away.
More traffic for these narrow roads that lead to Chittlehamholt...
going towards the Exeter Inn Pub from the direction of Highbullen |
.... further on down here |
And before anyone starts writing a strongly-worded “not in my back
yard” type accusation let me put one thing straight here:
I am fond of Highbullen. Daughter Kathy and I stayed there when we
were on Escape To The Country (BBC TV
show which found us our home here in Chittlehamholt.) Husband Ron and I stayed
there for the first two nights when we moved in. It is a lovely old country
house hotel, full of character in superb grounds. The new owner (timeshare developer Frank Chapman) apparently bought it for his daughter Susie Gowenlock who, it is said,
remembers splendid holidays at Highbullen in its heyday of being the place for
celebs to relax in privacy and to play golf. Legend has it that Sir Laurence
Olivier used to pretend to be a member of staff and serve drinks behind the
bar.
It seems Ms Gowenlock is so very fond of her memories that she’s
quite happy to have its old-style country-house charm entirely destroyed by the
addition of these timeshare holiday lodges being built on parts of the
golf course and surrounding grounds. For the peace and quiet of its rural ambience to be
distorted, and for the night skies around
Highbullen and that end of the village
(there is no street lighting in Chittlehamholt) to be lit up like a Christmas tree.
Night Over Highbullen three views from one of the Chittlehamholt approach roads |
photos by A. Villager |
Incidentally most of us in the village have stated, over and over,
that we are proud of Highbullen – it is as much a part of Chittlehamholt as our community shop, village hall, the Exeter Inn pub, and the village church… but we
don’t want to stop being proud of it. Highbullen is a superb rural, peaceful –
almost unique – Country House Hotel. Why is Frank Chapman wanting to destroy
such a potential asset? Restore it to its former glory, market it with insight
and imagination as a luxury, idyllic, private, rural retreat to those with
money (and celeb status) who seek privacy, peace and quiet and somewhere to
relax knowing they’ll get it. Chittlehamholt as a village, if asked
nicely I think, wouldn’t mob Johnny Depp or Tom Cruise or… well you get the point.
(OK, I can't personally guarantee the Johnny Depp bit....)
Here's a quote to support my suggestion: "...in 1963 it [Highbullen] was bought by Hugh and Pam Neil who turned it in to a foodie destination that attracted some top names such as Delia Smith, who became a regular visitor in the seventies."
I wonder if I ought to contact Ms Smith to discover whether she's happy about Highbullen becoming a timeshare monster?
According to one newspaper when Mr Chapman bought the hotel he said :
' "It [Highbullen] has obviously gone through a bad period ... and we'd like to restore it to its former glory. That will take some time because it's rundown but it's in such a beautiful spot and has so much potential."
Mr Chapman, who introduced the concept of Timeshares to the UK in 1976, said one of his main aims is to bring back locals, which in turn will help turn the hotel's fortunes around.
"There's a good local membership who've been very patient. We need to bring them back in and bring confidence in the hotel back to the community. There won't be false promises here," he said. '
Not doing a very good job with building the confidence level is he?
So why do I care about all this? The hotel is on the opposite side
of the village to where I live, something like two miles away, but since I’ve
moved here I have come to love Chittlehamholt and have made many new, very
lovely friends. I have grown to appreciate the star-studded un-light-polluted
night sky; the fresh, clean air and the slower pace of life. The only noise at night is the wind and the owls. Except for the
nightmare of having to negotiate the traffic-jammed lanes if this enterprise
goes ahead, Highbullen won’t affect me. So why am I writing all this?
Why? Because I dislike these rich millionaire businessmen who have
absolutely no care or concern for anything or anyone outside their own profit-balance pockets. Because these sort of people trample all over the rest of us
who do
care.
I am writing this because I want to have my say. Highbullen is
trying to bully this village and its residents. Saying things like: (not exact
quotes just the gist…)
“If it wasn’t for us the village would die.” … er no, HB was
bankrupt before Mr Chapman bought it, and the village was doing quite nicely,
thank you.
“If this doesn’t succeed Highbullen will fail as a business and
Frank Chapman will re-sell; probably to an oligarch who will fly in with his
helicopter.” At least that solves the issue of the traffic in the lanes! I
doubt one little oligarch’s private helicopter would be any more intrusive than
the air-ambulance which flies over our back garden most days, or even the giant
Chinook helicopters that regularly make a (very low altitude) appearance.
The Village has been blackmailed several times with words like: "Frank Chapman's put a lot of money into this venture, it'll be your fault if it fails."
As one villager eloquently put it at the last public meeting: "Why should Chittlehamholt bear the brunt of Frank Chapman's bad business errors of judgement?" If he's messed up by buying the wrong hotel in the wrong location for his timeshare dreams, that's not our problem is it?
The manager, James Hemming, referring to the issue of farmers not giving
permission for the expansion of passing places on Newlands Hill (see above):
“That got put into the draft planning application by mistake, it should have
been deleted.” … If permission hadn’t been granted, why was it included in a
draft in the first place?
Mr Hemming, has whinged (several times) that opportunity
to talk about the initial plans were offered but: “no one came to talk to me.” He
is quite right no one did (well, I think two residents who live adjacent to
Highbullen did.) Why didn’t we? Because his offer was made at the very first
public meeting – before any plans had been published.
I didn’t take the offer up (neither did anyone else, for
presumably the same reason) because I had absolutely no idea what was being proposed! How can you discuss something when you don’t know what it is you are
discussing?
By the time the plans did come out there were several public
meetings arranged - so why the need for private ones? When the villagers had their say about these plans at one of these meetings they voted four in favour and seventy-two against.
Isn't that sufficient feedback for you Mr Hemming? Of course if you really want seventy-two of us coming to your office for a 'chat'...what, shall we say allow an hour each? Let's assume your working day is 9 a.m-5pm... Now my maths isn't wonderful, but I make that seventy-two people coming to see you would take up nine of your working days.
As in the story of The Monkey's Paw Mr H....
And this one really gets me angry: “There are a group of agitators
in the village trying to stir up trouble.” No, there is a group of concerned
villagers who are trying to stop a millionaire businessman who doesn’t live
here, from turning our rural village into a lavish timeshare New Town. There is
a big difference Mr Hemming! A very big difference – please stop insulting us
in this manner! (I guess this article makes me one of the condemned agitators?)
There are several more such quotes, but you get the idea.
This last one, though from Mr Hemming really did take the biscuit
for arrogance and outright patronisation: “There’s no point in fighting us, we’ll go to appeal and you won’t
stand a chance of defeating it.”
Maybe not – but we’ll bloomin’ well at least try mate!
One way we can do so is bring in a professional consultant.
Problem.
They cost money.
How is a small village with less than ninety houses going to raise
the money to get someone like this to help us? We probably can’t... which is what
these pompous property developers like Mr Chapman bank on, of course.
Again, though we are going to try!
We have the consultant, we already have half his fee pledged. We
need the other half.
I’m not asking for money, but if you would like to help fling a few stones at Goliath, and would like to help keep a little bit of Devon as it
should be kept, then even £1 would help us.
For reward, if you ever visit Chittlehamholt I’ll try my best to treat you to a
coffee in the Coffee Corner of the Village Shop. Or a pint of cider in the pub
…
or (maybe) a G & T in one of Highbullen’s luxury bars? (I can't guarantee a Laurence Olivier look-alike barman though, darling!)... (nor Johnny Depp.)
Celeb notebook - not sure who the guy in the hat is. He signed my notebook though. (and yes he is as good looking in reality as he is on film) |
You are more than welcome to leave a comment below – even if you
disagree with any (or all) of the above (although rudeness will be removed).
Thanks for being interested
enough to read this far!
Everything above is my PERSONAL opinion.
stroll through Chittlehamholt with GOOGLE street view (and see just how narrow our main street is!)
related articles :
North Devon Journal (includes a photo of what the timeshare lodges might look like)
Company information Frank W. Chapman
Dear Helen, I wish you and your neighbours every success in trying to resist Highbullen's timeshare-building plans. These things can be stopped : in Topsham where I now live the community has just bought a piece of land to stop it being built on, and when I lived in Exeter my neighbours and I stopped a small developer in his tracks by community lobbying. I am particularly sad to think of you having to suffer a) more traffic in the lanes and b) light pollution at night. One of the worst things about the traffic is that it will be people who are not local, but have merely come to spend a short time at their timeshare. I can see why you might prefer a helicopter-owning oligarch! Lily Neal
ReplyDeleteThank you Lily for your support! Exactly my point - the drivers using these narrow lanes will - for the most part - be totally unfamiliar with them and not be prepared for the narrowness. Plus many visitors to Highbullen (especially businessmen for conferences!) have big posh cars which they are terrified to throw into our high, very overgrown at this time of year hedgerows! (and believe me 'throw' is the right word!)
DeleteRequest to post a comment on behalf of John F Millar of Williamsburg Virginia: "I thought you’d like to know that time-shares are a major feature of the landscape at Williamsburg. There used to be about 10,000 hotel/motel/B&B rooms in greater Williamsburg, and then the time-shares came in. The hotel/motel/B&B rooms available are now down to about 6000, and there are about 6000 time-share units. Each unit typically has 3 bedrooms and a kitchen. For the most part, these time-shares remain unsold, so there is an aggressive campaign to market them as night-by-night accommodations to the general public. The typical nightly rate offered is $79. Imagine getting 3 bedrooms and a kitchen for $79/night! No hotel, motel, or B&B can compete, so every year there are hotels and motels and B&Bs going out of business, and those of us who remain have the lowest occupancy rates of any accommodations in all of Virginia. Meanwhile, more time-shares are under construction here." http://newporthousebb.com/
ReplyDeleteDear Helen, I do so hope that the village wins and this development is stopped - I hate to see money triumphing over people's feelings, quite apart from the sound common sense of road safety and so on. Good luck to you all.
ReplyDeleteThank you Margaret, your support is very much appreciated!
DeleteFor goodness sake, stick to your guns and fight these people. They are not interested in the rural idyll in which you all live - simply balance sheets. They will be the sort of people who profess to love the countryside and then leave a proximity light on all night because oooh, it's DARK. The same thing is happening where we live albeit on a bigger scale and the resulting volume of traffic simply leads to predictable crashes as people do not allow for black ice or horses/tractors on the road as they speed along (although it will be a VERY abrupt halt down your lanes!). Timeshare is completely wrong - much better to do as you suggest and just make it a very grand hotel or (and I'm not keen on the word but you know what I mean) spa retreat. They could even include collection from the nearest mainline station to encourage guests to travel by public transport and then SELL the idea that the only way to really appreciate the countryside is to get out into it so no car needed - enjoy the 'oasis' of peace & quiet that can be found there. PS Have I got the marketing job yet??? ;) PPS I'll email you.
ReplyDeleteThanks Lynn! If I recall HB did suggest running a private bus service but that seems to have been kicked out as I haven't personally heard any more of the idea. It wouldn't solve the problem though, unfortunately, as people prefer the convenience of their cars (fair enough) - the narrow lanes here are just NOT suitable for an excess of extra traffic. Newlands Hill in the winter is a very steep sheet of ice and on days like we've had recently (pouring rain for hours on end) it resembles a river more than a road. And even lovely sunny days cause hazards,because at certain times when the sun is low drivers are not just dazzled but 'blinded' as they come up the hill. More than once my son-in-law has had to slam on brakes because he can't see.
DeleteDouble thanks for your e-mail and yes, Tesco seems to do that all over the place (build outside small town - small town shopping area becomes a ghost town)
DeleteGood luck, Helen. Why must our society fall down on its knees to the idea that bigger is always better? Here in Canada we're closing all the small schools in favour of sending our children to huge monolithic factories. I'm from a different age where children went to one-room schools and learned to get along with all ages. I taught the little ones, listened to their reading, learned how to help others in that way, and did special projects with my teacher. I could also listen to lessons the older kids were having when I finished my own work. I'm not saying we need never change but bigger is NOT always better. Just think of your dress size!
ReplyDeleteGood luck, my dear!
Thank you Elaine for your words of support. AS you say, there is nothing wrong with change, but it must be the right change, at the right time, in the right place!
DeleteOoooo, I do so sympathise, Helen. These arrogant people and their misguided belief that they're doing us "poor country folk" some sort of favour, really annoy me to distraction! We're having a similar battle over a proposed monstrous mobile phone mast they want to stick on a hill overlooking our beautiful village. Despite the so-called public 'consultation' meeting where we said, putting it there is the worst possible place, they've gone ahead and applied for planning permission anyway! All the people who'll be able to see it don't want it (we don't want a signal "at any price") and a huge swathe of others are right behind us. Allegedly there are those who want a signal in the area but so far the number 'for' the scheme seems to be a grand total of one! Hopefully common sense (and our campaign) will prevail and the planners will turn it down.
ReplyDeleteI wish you the very best in your campaign, Helen. Power to the people!!!!!
Thanks Wendy - let me know if we can do anything to help with your mast! :-/
ReplyDeleteFrom Frankie Sheath
ReplyDeleteThank you Helen for your comments here, I wholeheartedly agree with everything you have said. I have been a resident of Chittlehamholt for 47 years. Although I like progress i don't want to see the village ruined by excessive building in the grounds of a hotel, nor the inordinate amout of traffic coming through the our lovely historical village that will be inevitable with the proposed developement.
Regards, Frankie
Thank you Frankie. I think the majority of villagers are fine for Highbullen to raise the standard of the hotel - its the scale of this thing that is the problem.
Delete